Subscribe RSSRSS | ABOUT | | ADVERTISE | JOBS
SonicFlare Hi-Fi Get Hip
SonicFlare Get Hip hi-fi guide
SonicFlare Get Hip Super Systems
SonicFlare Get Hip hi-fi is your wingman
SonicFlare Get Hip Sonic Circle

Grace m902 USB DAC Headphone Cuisinart

by Josh Ray, Apr 24 '06

 Images Archivesart 406Grace

Stereophiles gets its game on with the Grace m902 audio Swiss Army knife. Pay attention here: it's a headphone amplifier that has analog out to act as a preamp. It also sports USB for computer connectivity as well as traditional S/PDIF and AES/EBU digital inputs. So it's a mini preamp, DAC headphone amp and USB transport. It's okay to be confused. Simply, the m902 does just about everything except make waffles.

Stereophile says this of the Grace's DAC:

The Levinson processor cost a whopping $17,500 when last available, and yes, it did sound slightly better than the tenth-the-price Grace m902!

So is the Grace amazing or the Levinson way overpriced? Probably the latter. This is how the Grace stacks up against the $1000 Benchmark DAC-1, a nearly identical leatherman product:

At $1700, the Grace m902 costs 75% more than Benchmark's DAC-1. Is it nearly 'twice as good'? Probably not, by any rational calculus. But, using an emotional calculus, can the m902 provide twice the listening pleasure and twice the pride of ownership? I'd say 'yes.' Highly recommended."

Then goes on to say:

While it doesn't sound significantly better than the cheaper Benchmark, merely different, the fact that it offers analog as well as digital inputs and a remote control puts it in a different product class.

About those digital connections, Wes Phillips says the USB is vastly inferior to the antiquated connections. What's up with that? If that is true, then the USB was thrown in without really putting the effort in to making it great. USB, as I constantly say, is potentially a superior connection. Sad, sad, sad. Read the full article for a lot more comparisons and tests all across the board.

Comments

USB isn't the best I've heard, but it certainly works very well.

The I2S connection on the Empirical modified DACs is even better than USB.

Ian

Posted by: Ian White at April 24, 2006 5:13 PM

I respectfully disagree about the USB input. There are limited USB reciever chipsets available, and they all have serious compromises for sound quality. So until a manufacturer takes on the expense to develop a serious USB reciever chip and possibly the drivers to run them, USB remains an imperfect choice.

But there are not many options out there for superior connection of audio to computer.

Posted by: John Hughes at April 25, 2006 1:19 AM

Yeah, USB still has some growing up to do. I'm a fan of USB for the ease of use angle, same with music servers.

Ian, I2s and USB aren't mutually exclusive. The Scott Nixon USB DAC uses I2S to connect USB directly to the DAC. The Empirical DACS with I2S run from Off-Ramps with USB to I2S connectors.

Steve Nugent of Empirical is probably the most knowledgeable person in hi-fi on USB, I2S and why USB will ultimately kick CD's scrawny little ass. Here are the USB marching orders:

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue22/nugent.htm

Posted by: Josh Ray [SonicFlare] at April 25, 2006 1:31 AM

USB is clearly inferior to aes/ebu connection. I've run my Grace both ways and the difference is significant. If you want the best, spend a little extra and get an aes card for your computer.

Posted by: Mark at January 17, 2007 9:35 PM